User talk:38.88.12.178

October 2013
Hello, I'm Hello71. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Lacrosse because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ⁓ Hello  71  17:47, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tennis. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wolbo (talk) 18:37, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Tennis, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Wolbo (talk) 18:37, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

In a recent edit to the page Flag of Bulgaria, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Ginsuloft (talk) 11:58, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Some jerk on the Internet. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to American Revolutionary War because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=579616901 here]. --some jerk on the Internet   (talk)  14:38, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Otto von Bismarck, you may be blocked from editing. 78.26  (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 14:53, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at American Revolutionary War, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  15:41, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 17:51, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Blind man of Bethsaida has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Blind man of Bethsaida was changed by 38.88.12.178 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.902913 on 2013-11-15T15:20:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:20, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

April 2014
Hello, I'm Flyer22. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Homo sapiens because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 19:07, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edit to Tetris
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Epicgenius (talk) 14:48, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Hello, I'm Onel5969. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Magnesium sulfate because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Onel5969 (talk) 13:04, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2015
Hello, I'm Glane23. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to John the Baptist— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 13:48, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John the Baptist with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 13:49, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Elijah, you may be blocked from editing. Deli nk (talk) 13:51, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Montreal Canadiens— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  16:25, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Paul VI Catholic High School with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  17:25, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Paul VI Catholic High School. Deli nk (talk) 17:27, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Redox has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Redox was changed by 38.88.12.178 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.983145 on 2015-11-24T14:38:21+00:00.

Help me!
Please help me with...

38.88.12.178 (talk) 17:03, 16 May 2016 (UTC)