User talk:38.88.239.66

January 2019
Hello, I'm Ubiquity. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Michael Alden Bayard have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. ubiquity (talk) 21:38, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Alden Bayard. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Materialscientist (talk) 23:05, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Alden Bayard, you may be blocked from editing. We don't have an irony notice, so disruptive seems most relevant Nosebagbear (talk) 14:00, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2019
Hello, I'm Gilliam. An edit that you recently made to Conservation of energy seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! – Gilliam (talk) 16:47, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2019
Hello, I'm LizardJr8. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Flag of Russia have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. LizardJr8 (talk) 22:38, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ugly (Life of Agony album). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. LizardJr8 (talk) 22:38, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This notif ws so unexpected lol. I myself did none of these; this is a school network, so there's bound to be some spam lmao. Ceterum, I concur with thee on thy diagnosis that that "contribution[]" "appear[ed] to constitute vandalism." Yes, vandalism is bad, but a word of advice for thee: if it's totally obvious that a word or phrase is vandalism, don't say that it "appear['th] to constitute vandalism"; do straight up say that it is vandalism. Using a verb like appear or seem weaken'th your statement, because even though everyone may know that thou art totally sure it is vandalism, thy refusal to use a strong and definite verb implieth that thou refusest to phrase thy thoughts strongly and definitely, even though thou hast full conviction. 38.88.239.66 (talk) 16:56, 9 December 2019 (UTC)