User talk:39.42.60.142

April 2019
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Xi Jinping, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.  General Ization Talk  05:19, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at List of longest-ruling non-royal national leaders since 1900, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.  General Ization Talk  05:30, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at List of longest-ruling non-royal national leaders since 1900.  General Ization Talk  05:41, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on List of longest-ruling non-royal national leaders since 1900; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.  General Ization Talk  05:46, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you.  General Ization Talk  05:48, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

List of longest-ruling non-royal national leaders since 1900
Would you like to explain what you think the "consensus" is at the Talk page of this article that justifies your repeated removal of the content? If you are referring to this discussion, there is no consensus there.  General Ization <i style="color: #000666;">Talk </i> 05:53, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * In the mean time, I'm waiting for your report at WP:ANI. Kindly speed it up; I don't have all night to waste on this. <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:140;"> General Ization  <i style="color: #000666;">Talk </i> 06:01, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as done at List of longest-ruling non-royal national leaders since 1900. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 06:02, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

I don't think you are right with singling me out. Why General Ization should not be blocked for reverting 3 times against consensus? You are also ignoring his blatant WP:ROLLBACK abuse.

I already warned him to stop abusing Rollback and he kept abusing it even after the warning.

On his own talk page he also acted deceptive by saying that I am editing "without explanation in your edit summary" when I explained every edit.

He is the one here to cause disruption while I was only maintaining the accurate version. Either block him too or unblock me and protect present version. But his rollback rights must be removed. 39.42.60.142 (talk) 06:20, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Your edit summaries contained claims about me and my supposed abuses; they contained no explanation for your removal of the content, which they are required to do. You repeatedly mention consensus, but there is no consensus at that article's Talk page (where you, as this IP, have never contributed to any discussion) to remove this content.  In fact, taken as a whole, the several discussions of this content over a number of years show a consensus to keep it.  It appears to be a single registered editor and a number of IPs (who, like you, seem to be single-purpose-accounts) who feel otherwise. <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:140;"> General Ization  <i style="color: #000666;">Talk </i> 06:26, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

I don't think you are right with singling me out. Why General Ization should not be blocked for reverting 3 times against consensus? You are also ignoring his blatant WP:ROLLBACK abuse.

I already warned him to stop abusing Rollback and he kept abusing it even after the warning.

On his own talk page he also acted deceptive by saying that I am editing "without explanation in your edit summary" when I explained every edit.

He is the one here to cause disruption while I was only maintaining the accurate version. Either block him too or unblock me and protect present version. But his rollback rights must be removed. 39.42.60.142 (talk) 06:37, 21 April 2019 (UTC)