User talk:3E1I5S8B9RF7

Welcome!
Hello, 3E1I5S8B9RF7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! - 🐦Do☭torWho42 ( ⭐ ) 19:05, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Hi, I'm MJ500 I noticed with this [|this edit] you added some information to the article 2017 but didn't add a reliable source, it's been removed for now, but if you would like to add a source and re-add it your more than welcome to do so. Thank You MJ500 Fancy a coffee? 10:03, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Bosnian War into Yugoslav Wars. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:20, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Deportation of the Chechens and Ingush
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Deportation of the Chechens and Ingush you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seraphim System -- Seraphim System (talk) 11:20, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Deportation of the Chechens and Ingush
The article Deportation of the Chechens and Ingush you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Deportation of the Chechens and Ingush for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seraphim System -- Seraphim System (talk) 11:02, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Unique username
Yours is the most interesting username I have seen in a while, how do you even remember it :' Any special reason for it? Gotitbro (talk) 02:09, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Chechen Deportation in 1944.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Chechen Deportation in 1944.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Aardakh 1944.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:22, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Deportation of the Balkars
Hi. I am copy editing Deportation of the Meskhetian Turks for GOCE. Starting on this reminded me of copy editing Deportation of the Balkars back in March, so I had a look at it to see how it was getting on. I noticed the several edits from you which have notably improved it. Nice work. A not much noticed corner of Wikipedia and of human knowledge and it is good to know that someone is working away at it. Gog the Mild (talk) 21:31, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ghostbusters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Wizard of Oz ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Ghostbusters check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Ghostbusters?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Many thanks
Many thanks for the GA review of Julliberrie's Grave! Midnightblueowl (talk) 17:33, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Re: Talk:Operation Storm
Per WP:RFCCLOSE, I'd say right about now - the RfC has been running for 24 days, with no additional input in the last 10 days. Apart from that, I'd say there is a rough consensus not to list the disputed entry in the infobox. A closing summary should be added. GregorB (talk) 12:23, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * No problem. Will do it hopefully in a couple of days. GregorB (talk) 15:47, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Never mind this, I'll close it shortly. GregorB (talk) 11:00, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * It's effectively closed now - I don't see a meaningful way to dispute the outcome. GregorB (talk) 21:06, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Deportation of the Kalmyks
Hi, I was looking at reviewing the article for GA. While the sources are solid, I felt that the article could use a copyedit. Would you like me to submit it to WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests? It takes about 2 to 3 weeks for them to get to it. Please let me know. --K.e.coffman (talk) 04:40, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Deportation of the Meskhetian Turks
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Deportation of the Meskhetian Turks you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of K.e.coffman -- K.e.coffman (talk) 00:41, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Deportation of the Meskhetian Turks
The article Deportation of the Meskhetian Turks you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Deportation of the Meskhetian Turks for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of K.e.coffman -- K.e.coffman (talk) 00:21, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rushmore (film)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rushmore (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Abryn -- Abryn (talk) 03:40, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rushmore (film)
The article Rushmore (film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rushmore (film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Abryn -- Abryn (talk) 02:42, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Aardakh 1944.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Aardakh 1944.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Concerning edits
I see you have done editing on the Operation Storm article so figured I would reach out to you for opinion. It seems editors have added content that doesn’t completely match source or are outdated as per later court rulings. It seems the edit vetting now in place allowed one editor to have their way. Also, how were recent edits allowed? One of the sources added for Varitas doesn’t seem RS and the the background seems now skewed to one side. Wording also seemed pov contradicting sources. The additions added this month don’t seem NPoV. Could you take a closer look? Thank you PortalTwo (talk) 14:57, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ethnic cleansing in the Bosnian War
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ethnic cleansing in the Bosnian War you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jon698 -- Jon698 (talk) 23:40, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

GA review takeover
If you want me to takeover of the review on Ethnic cleansing in the Bosnian War GA nomination, you need to do following: I will take it from there.-- ౪ Santa ౪ 99°  10:25, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Increment the |page= parameter (e.g. from "page=1" to "page=2"), and change the |status= parameter from "status=onreview" or "status=onhold" to the blank setting "status=". (Per this instruction page)

Your GA nomination of Ethnic cleansing in the Bosnian War
The article Ethnic cleansing in the Bosnian War you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ethnic cleansing in the Bosnian War for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Santasa99 -- Santasa99 (talk) 16:40, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

"Ethnic cleansing in Chechnya" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Ethnic cleansing in Chechnya. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 15 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed,Rosguill talk 01:14, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Congrats!
Congratulations! Ethnic cleansing in the Bosnian War is now GA. Good work, and since the article has potential, we should pursue it even further with peer review, and eventually to reach A/FA status.-- ౪ Santa ౪ 99°  18:15, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ethnic cleansing in the Bosnian War
The article Ethnic cleansing in the Bosnian War you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ethnic cleansing in the Bosnian War for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Santasa99 -- Santasa99 (talk) 18:22, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Excess mortality in the Soviet Union under Joseph Stalin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ingush. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Aardakh 1944.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Aardakh 1944.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
Hello, and thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia! However, you should know that it is not a good idea to remove citations or information sourced through citations simply because a link to a source is not working, as you did to Soviet–Afghan War. Dead links should not be deleted. Instead, please repair or replace the link, if possible, and ensure properly sourced information is retained. Often, a live substitute link can be found. Links not used as references, notes or citations are not as important, such as those listed in the "External links" or "Further reading" sections, but bad links in those sections should also be fixed if possible. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Warm Regards, ZI Jony  (Talk) 14:44, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Deportation of Koreans in the Soviet Union
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Deportation of Koreans in the Soviet Union you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Keresluna -- Keresluna (talk) 17:20, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Slip-up
Sorry, my mistake. Shaky fingers. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 12:48, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Deportation of Koreans in the Soviet Union
The article Deportation of Koreans in the Soviet Union you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Deportation of Koreans in the Soviet Union for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Keresluna -- Keresluna (talk) 22:01, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Battle of Vukovar
Ok I don't have time to argue with you about the "pyrhhic" victory, but I can quickly demant your claims about there being Serb forces outside command of Yugoslavia. This is simply not true. Republic of Serbian Krajina formed in 1992, not in 1991. All the Serb units, were formally under the command of either T.O (Teritorijalna Odbrana), or JNA. Arkan's unit was for example under command of Radovan Stojicic - Badza. So my recommendation for you is to change "Serb/Yugoslav pyhrric victory" to "Yugoslav Pyrrhic victory" since it stood like that for 10 years, before someone changed it.

GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Relevant ITN nomination
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates § Balkan Wars tribunal convictions. &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 20:44, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Good articles at 21:17, 31 December 2021 (UTC).

Orphaned non-free image File:Aardakh 1944.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Aardakh 1944.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, 3E1I5S8B9RF7

Thank you for creating February 2022 Kharkiv cluster bombing.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 23:01, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Removal of soured stats from intro
Why did you remove the sourced stats of 20,000-50,000 total from the intro here? You only left totals up to a specific time period. This went unnoticed for two years right after my edit with no explanation. The article victim totals section states these number ranges. OyMosby (talk) 12:54, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Looking further I see I pasted in the higher figures wrongly for the 1992 short term. I mean that figure in total for the years. I still think we should keep the overall era totals as they are sourced. I made sure to put them separate from the three month totals. 20-50k definitely did not flee in just 3 months haha. Could you please double check my edits in case I may have missed something? I also included totals from other parts of Serbia given the article is about the whole state not just Vojvodina. Cheers OyMosby (talk) 13:49, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Multiple sources state 20-25,000 and two other stated 50,000 but you removed it from the intro. Also removed one of the sources. So a major stat was lost. Multiple sources stated more than 10k total. Why 10k only when that was a for only a three month span? Events continued after those three months? It was in the body so seems significant for the intro. It can come across as downsizing victim counts by stoping only at 3 months. You added the 20,000 part by years end but removed the sourced count for past that year. You see what I’m getting at? I just wanted to understand the reasoning. Like if one of the figures are flawed or the sources are bad. But the sources seemed RS. OyMosby (talk) 15:28, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * No worries. Just wanted to see all is well to avoid edit conflicts. Cheers OyMosby (talk) 16:04, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert
Mellk (talk) 13:42, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Warning
This is completely inappropriate. You do not know me, you have never interacted with me before, you did not bother to discuss the revert with me, yet already after a revert you are not even suggesting, but commanding me to step down from an entire topic area. Don't continue with this kind of behavior. Mellk (talk) 13:44, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Deportation of Koreans in the Soviet Union
Hi 3E1I5S8B9RF7. I've restored the Painand Stephan cites in Deportation of Koreans in the Soviet Union, as they are still required by referencing. Removing these causes a "no target error", for details see the tracking category Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors, and the documentation for the relevant short form reference (sfnp in this case). The tracking category also has details of how to turn these errors messages on, if you don't have them on already. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 17:47, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (second request)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Bucha massacre into Disinformation in the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:27, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Introducing false coordinates into Wikipedia
I had to correct the coordinates you put in the article June 2023 Kramatorsk missile strike, which were nowhere near the site of the attack. It is not acceptable to use the coordinates from the article on the city. If you don't know how to find coordinates, leave them blank and let editors fill them in. Abductive (reasoning) 11:59, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Croatia War of Independence
Hello, in your edit here, what was the reason of removing the 2021 First-Degree Verdict about the details describing what the joint criminal enterprise was, it’s aims and all the various people and factions found complicit in it? I see that those two individuals were newly found guilty and given 15 years where as before it said they were found not guilty, but why were all the other existing details removed? They were found guilty for being part of a joint criminal enterprise with intentions to drive out non-Serbs out from areas of Bosnia and Croatia. Particularly this:

''joint criminal enterprise involving Milosevic and other Serbian political, military and police officials. The court found that "from at least August 1991, a joint criminal enterprise existed" whose aim was to "forcibly and permanently remove.. Croats, Bosnian Muslim and Bosnian Croats, from large areas of Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. [384] Those implicated in the enterprise included senior political, military, and police leadership in Serbia, the SAO Krajina, the SAO Eastern Slavonia, Baranja and Western Syrmia, and Republika Srpska, [384][385]''

Also removal of:

In 2017, Dragan Vasiljković commander of a Croatian Serb paramilitary unit, he was convicted of war crimes sentenced by a Croatian court to 15 years in prison.

Is the above 2021 finding negated in the 2023 finding? It appears to still apply to the other listed parties even if not to Stanisic and Simatovic specifically but relevant to the article. Wouldn’t it make sense to keep the 2021 section and just add that in 2023 they were ultimately convicted found guilty? Also they were found guilty for Crimes in Bosnia and Croatia not just Bosnia it seems.

Also is passage excerpt about the Martić verdict related to the drafted joint enterprise document thrown out by Carla Del Ponte related? Reads a little confusing so wasn’t sure. It jumps straight i to the verdict without explaining it is a verdict not the draft spoken about a sentence before. This is also why I mentioned the removal of the Joint Criminal Enterprise expansion as it seems the courts in 2021 concluded (In a First Degree Verdict) the draft Hoare mentioned was validated in court in 2021 unless it was a different enterprising they are referring to? The whole things has be cross-eyed honestly hehe.

Cheers. OyMosby (talk) 22:05, 18 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi again, 3E1I5S8B9RF7. Appreciate expanding the joint enterprises descript.


 * Wished to also ask, why was it move from the bottom of the section about War Crime

trials and placed further up?


 * Also it still seems to be missing the First Degree Ruling in 2021 implicating “Milosevic and other Serbian political, military and police officials, senior political, military, and police leadership in Serbia, the SAO Krajina, the SAO Eastern Slavonia, Baranja and Western Syrmia, and Republika Srpska.”
 * This was original just under the paragraph about the First and Second degree rulings regarding Croatian leadership. Should still be mentioned as the 2023 ruling update doesn’t remove it I think. Otherwise it makes it seem like only Stanisic and Simatovic were part of the enterprise and not Milosovic, RSK, RS, etc which are not mentioned elsewhere in the section. I think the 2021 part should be left in tact with just a small 2023 update mentioning that those two individuals were eventually convicted as well.


 * I retuned in and placed in chronologically before the 2023 ruling for context. Same as other findings which have initial findings and follow up Second Degree rulings.


 * Thoughts? OyMosby (talk) 18:28, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * The section is really big already, with too much details, it might require trimming down a bit, but overall I think it is fine the way it is now. It is difficult to decide which parts should be shortened since a lot of these verdicts are important for international law.--3E1I5S8B9RF7 (talk) 09:08, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Novyi Korotych post office attack for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Novyi Korotych post office attack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Novyi Korotych post office attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Govvy (talk) 16:29, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
You have recently made edits related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans. This is a standard message to inform you that Eastern Europe or the Balkans is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Contentious topics. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see WP:CTVSDS.

— Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 03:36, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Your contributed article, 2024 Chernihiv missile strike


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, 2024 Chernihiv missile strike. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – April 2024 Chernihiv missile strike. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at April 2024 Chernihiv missile strike. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Pbritti (talk) 15:16, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Please ignore the above: I have instead redirected the article per the standard procedure for recently-created duplicate articles. ~ Pbritti (talk) 15:21, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
Your edit to Russian war crimes has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:34, 28 May 2024 (UTC)