User talk:3Ealet

January 2024
Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia. If you are interested to know how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements already in Wikipedia – and, if possible, correct them. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with sanctions, which could include a block from editing. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Hemiauchenia (talk) 01:17, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 14:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Hello, I'm Tollens. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Sarcopterygii—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Tollens (talk) 02:38, 21 January 2024 (UTC)


 * There are only 8 species of Sarcopterygii and this is just a pitiful mess. 3Ealet (talk) 02:40, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sarcopterygii. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 02:43, 21 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Just stop! By making a mess, Sarcopterygii is a loser. There are only 8 existing species, which is a complete abyss. Is there any evidence to refute it? 3Ealet (talk) 02:45, 21 January 2024 (UTC)