User talk:3alaalquds

Introduction to contentious topics
== Welcome! ==

Hi 3alaalquds! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! Selfstudier (talk) 17:20, 13 March 2024 (UTC)


 * (passing-by user) @Selfstudier: Actually, that prohibition on edits related to the Palestine Israel directly excludes edits made in userspace (see WP:CT/A-I).
 * Of course, an account who can't take part of the discussion and that has just been created mass inviting people to the discussion is probably cause for other policy concerns.
 * – 2804:F14:80C6:A301:BDB5:2E3E:64E9:12A8 (talk) 01:13, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * See Arca here, only namespace 1 is allowed, this space is namespace 3 as I understand it, the WP:ARBECR restriction is intended to be a broad restriction, edit requests only, ie on an article talk page. Selfstudier (talk) 11:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @Selfstudier I don't see where they are addressing userspace? I mean, namespace 1 (WP:NS) is the "Talk:" namespace. The link I gave you, which shows the current ArbCom decisions defines the "conflict area" (directly excluding userspace, but not excluding the Talk: namespace) and right below that says:
 * - "[..]The area of conflict is designated as a contentious topic.", followed by
 * - "[..]The extended confirmed restriction is imposed on the area of conflict.", followed again by
 * - "[..]Each editor is limited to one revert per page per 24 hours on any edits made to content within the area of conflict.[..]"
 * So no, the extended confirmed restriction does apply to namespace 1, it's just that the extended confirmed restriction, linked in that page, makes an exception for constructive edit requests. The userpace however, is not part of the area of conflict at all, and is therefore not subject to any of the 3 general sanctions. – 2804:F14:80C6:A301:BDB5:2E3E:64E9:12A8 (talk) 12:32, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * This is also stated at Arbitration/Active sanctions (search for WP:CT/A-I that page). – 2804:F14:80C6:A301:BDB5:2E3E:64E9:12A8 (talk) 12:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Not the place to discuss this.Selfstudier (talk) 12:40, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Well, you're welcome to discuss it, I don't really care. I was just informing you. Have a good day. – 2804:F14:80C6:A301:BDB5:2E3E:64E9:12A8 (talk) 12:42, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Note that I'm not the one who started the discussion, the filer failed to notify you about the discussion as required Stylez995 (talk) 12:17, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Indefinite block
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. Specifically, WP:CANVASS-only account (only edits), involving the WP:PIA topic area which is also subject to WP:ECR (filter 1055 tripped repeatedly). At the very least, a convincing explanation is due. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. El_C 12:57, 14 March 2024 (UTC)