User talk:3l3ktr0sh0ck3r

Hello I am Dvannamers, I noticed you removed my legitimate sourced edits to the Kevin Mitnick page. I reverted back to the text that was entered from sourced material.Dvannamers (talk) 04:37, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Reverted back. Please make incremental, conservative edits. Many read like promotional material and hyperbolic praise rather than encyclopedic objectivity.

Nope these edits are completely within Wikipedia's policy and based on legitimate sourced material that is appears to be factual. It appears you have went to great lengths to vandalize the Kevin Mitnick page based on your bias against the guy.

Wikipedia policy's allows additions/ changes based on sourced facts which are referenced in the edits. Please do not advise me of how to make edits as you have no authority to decide how I add information to any Wikipedia page as long as it compiles with Wikipedia Policy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dvannamers (talk • contribs) 08:04, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Looks like I have been too fast with the "block" button, though I don't understand why you removed the link to an article about the person on Forbes, and instead added a link to apparently unrelated defcon.org. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 19:21, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello I am Dvannamers,

This user is really Boorsours who was blocked for vandalism just using another user id to vandalize the Kevin Mitnick page. Reverted.