User talk:41.144.73.149

Sam Curran
Please read about WP:NPOV. You're adding information about colonialisation that doesn't really belong on that page and doing it in a way which creates massive NPOV issues. I think saying "taken back" is much better than seized, but beyond that is really difficult. As I sad in my edit summary, if you can find a way to say something about the land itself - preferably with reasonable sources (i.e. balanced ones) then that might be OK, but simply stating, without any form of reference, that the land was seized during colonialisation is really tricky and doesn't really provide any form of historical context for *this* land. It would probably be better to discuss this on the article talk page to get some consensus - but that's what we need to get, not you insisting on a specific wording. Blue Square Thing (talk) 10:24, 26 December 2019 (UTC)