User talk:41.169.139.186

May 2024
Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Coloureds, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 10:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Coloureds, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. ''Also, I think you added content written by AI. Please don't do that.'' Tacyarg (talk) 09:42, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

June 2024
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cape Coloureds. Sjö (talk) 08:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Cape Coloureds, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - 16:01, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Lesley-Ann Brandt. - Arjayay (talk) 16:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)


 * As a Coloured person i am simply stating facts. 41.169.139.186 (talk) 10:06, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I will gain the rights as you so much request.
 * Have yourself a blessed day! 41.169.139.186 (talk) 10:06, 10 June 2024 (UTC)


 * No, you are not "simply stating facts". You change articles, often in contradiction of the sources just next to the sentences you change. Wikipedia takes sourcing very seriously and deliberately introducing information that is incorrect will eventually lead to a block. And please, please stop calling your edits spelling checks. We are not stupid, we can see that a 65 character change is not just correction of a misspelling. Sjö (talk) 12:02, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Coloureds has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. ''You wrote "Spelling errors" but you changed content, which means that your edit summary was misleading. Please see Help:Edit summary for information about what to write and what not to write.'' Sjö (talk) 06:08, 20 June 2024 (UTC)