User talk:41.186.194.39

June 2023
Hello, I'm Unite together. I noticed that in this edit to Kebede Michael, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. And ALLAH said, “Together we unite!” And there’s power. 13:33, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kebede Michael, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Blua lago  (talk)  15:44, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kebede Michael, you may be blocked from editing. Nmacpherson (talk) 16:15, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

July 2023
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Menelik II, you may be blocked from editing. Reshadp (talk) 12:54, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Menelik II. Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 17:19, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. PhilKnight (talk) 17:34, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

August 2023
Please take more care when repeating edits that have previously resulted in your account being blocked (as here). In this instance you simply reintroduced a repeated section, which is not unduly disruptive. But being extra careful and checking one's work is the sign of a competent editor. Thank you Nick Moyes (talk) 19:56, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Kebede Michael, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. CodeTalker (talk) 21:16, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Kebede Michael. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 2406:3003:2077:1E60:D760:F1FB:9E28:69EF (talk) 22:58, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Kebede Michael. CodeTalker (talk) 23:28, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Nick Moyes (talk) 09:03, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.