User talk:41.202.207.15

February 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bank of America has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:28, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bank of America was changed by 41.202.207.15 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.859507 on 2018-02-01T00:28:11+00:00.

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. Please add your messages to the bottom of the talk page, or they may be overlooked. I deleted the article because
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management. Most of the text was unreferenced or sourced to non-independent pages like the company website. The refs were also just bare urls
 * The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:
 * significant coverage in
 * independent,
 * multiple,
 * reliable,
 * secondary sources.
 * Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability. Without proper refs, notability can't be established


 * Articles must be neutral, encyclopaedic and non-promotional in tone and should include hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, turnover or profits.
 * there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections. That's particularly the case when they are spamlinks to affiliated sites.
 * the article was a copyright violation of this and this. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial but there is no indication that the copied sites allow free use. Text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
 * You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also guidance for editors with conflicts of interest and writing about yourself.
 * Since you work directly or indirectly for the organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, since you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:     . Please provide the required disclosure either on your ip user page and on the user page of any registered account you may use. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message, and note that some contributors to this article have already been blocked.

We often restore deleted text on request, but for legal reasons we don't do so for copyright violations, as in this case.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above

If you want to reply, you can do so on my talk page. You can alternatively leave a message on this page, and I will know you have done so if you start it with my user name, User:Jimfbleak and sign it with four tildes ~ when you post it. That will send me an alert. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:01, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

February 2021
Hello, I'm KylieTastic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Ambazonia have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. KylieTastic (talk) 15:31, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.