User talk:41.249.226.24

July 2022
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Cheikh Bouamama. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 23:49, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Cheikh Bouamama. M.Bitton (talk) 00:46, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Cheikh Bouamama. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 02:20, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Cheikh Bouamama, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. M.Bitton (talk) 02:21, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

What are you playing at?
If something is not in the source, you can't add it, it's as simple as that. Besides, 1) back then, Morocco was limited to a tiny area (the rest of what is part of it today was no man's land) and 2) Cheikh Bouamama is known as an Algerian hero for it is in Algeria that he fought the French with the other members of his tribe (the Awlad Sidi Shaykh). M.Bitton (talk) 00:52, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Stop this misleading information
Morocco in the year 1830 was a country whose borders reached the Senegal River. Sheikh Bouamama was born in the city of Figuig, which is located in Morocco. He is a Moroccan who helped the Algerians in their resistance against colonialism.This does not mean that he is Algerian, Sheikh Bouamama, Moroccan by birth and death as well 41.249.226.24 (talk) 01:49, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism, as done at Cheikh_Bouamama. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 06:46, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.