User talk:41.254.9.127

Zyklon B is a pesticide, used to kill the pest that carried Rickettsia bacteria. The gas chambers were used to smoke out the clothes the prisoners would wear. Claiming a pesticide as the main cause of "exterminating Jews" is a politically driven statement and should be approached with caution when stating facts.
 * Nonsense. (This refers to this edit.) The source is an OUP book, which is good enough. Drmies (talk) 02:21, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Reply: There is clear foul play regarding this part of history. This is a corrupt, dishonest act of documenting the victors side of History. There are clear doubts as to the use of Zyklon B. And ... The holocaust. Lies will eventually come out one day.
 * No. The Holocaust is indisputable historical fact and has been accepted as such by serious academics for decades. Period. -- prmcd16 👽 (u)&bull;(t) 02:29, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

There is CLEARLY NO FORM OF VANDALISM when a request was made to add more official sources as opposed to one. ONE OFFICIAL SOURCE, does not make it "OFFICIAL" and it does not matter how many MEDALS or CERTIFICATES or EXPERT scholarship this one person / professor has, MORE SOURCES, that agree to the claim will make it a more trustworthy and true claim. There are OBVIOUS doubts on the validity of the claim of Zyklon B. STATING that it is UNDENIABLE and removing the request to more sources is OBVIOUS CENSORSHIP.
 * There are no obvious doubts, there's only you trolling. You were probably looking for some other site, maybe Conservapedia or whatever. I'm going to block you for Holocaust denial brought into article space. Drmies (talk) 02:33, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

I have only requested More sources to the CLAIM. If you wish to block, you would only re-assert that i am right, in the dishonest documentation of History and its fact. I am NOT here to troll, but thank you for re-asserting the obvious. Historical accuracy will one day emerge. You speak of Vandalism, THIS is a pure form of Vandalism of the Truth, the simple request on multiple sources to assert the same claim. Corruption is RIFE with Holocaust it appears.
 * You want sources? Fine. Go read the Holocaust article and you'll find 439 sources for your perusal. In the meantime, quit trying to argue for something you're on the wrong side of. -- prmcd16 👽 (u)&bull;(t) 02:47, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Zyklon B, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Drmies (talk) 02:21, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 02:34, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.


 * Pinging Drmies, do you have anything to respond with this? 2601:1C0:102:3E3E:3DC8:E008:248D:45CA (talk) 03:09, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I sure do. Thanks. Drmies (talk) 03:43, 15 December 2016 (UTC)