User talk:42.105.3.154

User:Drmies, Instead of blocking me on the words of another editor, why don't you check for yourself? I messaged User:Extorc saying sorry ( it is clearly written). Even if he was offended by what I wrote after, I deleted the message immediately.

I just wanted to fix an article that read like a politically opinionated blog. Seriously, "challenges"? On a politician's biography? Would you allow an article if it said "Joe Biden faced numerous challeges from the Republicans in his run for president. Even after the election, the Capitol was attacked by Trump supporters. "? User:Extorc has constantly reverted my attempt to remove that portion from the article. It should atleast have a different title like "Controversies" and worded in a neutral tone. Most of the statements in that section are allegations, if you had bothered to read the sources. That entire section was written by a single user User: Aniket kr. Shaw. If you see through his other edits, it is clear that he has a political bias. (Your edit yesterday saying "what horrible writing" - that sentence was written by the same user) There has been a recent influx of editors whose only goal is to sanitize articles and change their tone to pro-BJP. I hope you will not let them run over Wikipedia. 42.105.3.154 (talk) 11:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Insulting and then removing is still insulting, and I've had enough of your disruption. You are clearly not the right editor to improve that article, and even if you were, you need to work collaboratively, even with those whom you don't agree with. And instead of insulting and blanking, you could have started something on a talk page or a noticeboard. Do not think that we won't impose a longer block if this continues. Drmies (talk) 16:15, 30 January 2022 (UTC)