User talk:42.113.36.97

Welcome!
Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 17:15, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Sudan, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 17:44, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

, nothing is unexplained, what question do you have with that? 42.113.36.97 (talk) 17:47, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * When you remove content, especially when properly source, you have to give a valid reason for its removal (that goes for every bit of it). M.Bitton (talk) 17:49, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * , I gave reason already. 42.113.36.97 (talk) 17:51, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * No, you didn't properly explain and furthermore, giving a reason doesn't make the reason valid. Reasons like "too much history" make no sense, because if that's the case (something which needs to be substantiated), then a discussion is needed on what needs to be deleted. M.Bitton (talk) 17:55, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * so what do you not like to be deleted? These are minor details, if you don't like such details to be deleted, then almost nothing you will want to be deleted. 42.113.36.97 (talk) 17:59, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * You're the one editing the article and it's your responsibility to justify the removal. I have also noticed that you did the same thing on another article (October 2021 Sudanese coup d'état), adding (without any reason whatsoever) quotation marks to words of your choosing. M.Bitton (talk) 18:03, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * The content removed are for the same reason: being too detailed; details in the opening are said below, and some details below are said in main articles. Check WP:SUMMARY and get an idea. This is very common and normal. 42.113.36.97 (talk) 18:10, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * There is nothing common about removing content without giving a valid reason, and the fact that your edits have been reverted by two editors so far should tell you that there is an issue. Whether you'll do something about it or not is entirely up to you. I'm done here. M.Bitton (talk) 18:18, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * how do you defined what is a "valid" reason? Look, people are not obliged to meet your high-standard demand. Being in the position of the reverter does not give you authority to ask for whatever you want. In Sudan, only you are reverting me, there is no one else, and this is sure to get a lot of watchers but yet no one revert me because they have no question with my edits, and then it comes only you, so the problem really is you. 42.113.36.97 (talk) 18:28, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * In that case, let me make easier for you. When you leave a BS explanation after removing content, others can leave another BS explanation when restoring it. Hope that helps and please don't ping me again. M.Bitton (talk) 18:31, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Boud (talk) 18:50, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on User talk:M.Bitton. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 18:55, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.