User talk:42.201.194.144

May 2021
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Umm Kulthum bint Ali, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that.   ~~ 🌀𝚂𝙲𝚂 𝙲𝙾𝚁𝙾𝙽𝙰🌀 16:33, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Umm Kulthum bint Ali, you may be blocked from editing.   Closingbracket (talk) 16:36, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Umm Kulthum bint Ali. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

''The page is now limited to edits by experienced editors for a short while; please use this time to discuss your concerns on the talk-page, Talk:Umm Kulthum bint Ali. Thank you,'' Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:18, 9 May 2021 (UTC)