User talk:42.235.163.124

October 2017
Hello, I'm Haploidavey. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Karl Marx, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Haploidavey (talk) 14:32, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Karl Marx, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Please read through Wikipedia policies on reliable sources (linked above). Wikipedia articles don't qualify as reliable source -- and the de Sade article doesn't mention Marx at all. '' Haploidavey (talk) 14:41, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Karl Marx. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Haploidavey (talk) 14:45, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Marx and de Sade
Hi. It occurs to me that perhaps you mean de Sade's novel "Justine" (?) "Juliette" (sorry 'bout that) in which the notion that "religion is the opium of the people" -- per this blog-spot, for example; is found. The idea has been remarked by some as relevant to Marxist thought, or even a source of inspiration to Marx. To qualify for inclusion in the Marx article, the association would have to be asserted by a reliable secondary or tertiary source as significant, and more than coincident. Even if that were so, that would not automatically justify inclusion in the infobox; please note that all infobox content should only summarise well-sourced content in the main article. Wikipedia has an article on Juliette (novel), but it's unsourced and doesn't mention Marx, Marxism, or the "opium of the people" quote. Haploidavey (talk) 15:00, 25 October 2017 (UTC)