User talk:42.3.184.152

October 2022
Hello, I'm LilianaUwU. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Golden billion seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Liliana UwU (talk / contribs) 22:53, 13 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Calling the ideas of others a conspiracy theory seems to be very judgemental and biased. In some cases it is justified. However this concept is not far removed from other political theories. It doesn't depend of a belief in some secret agenda by some unknown cabal. Instead it is a way of seeing the developed world as being selfish and exploitative. So I posted my suggestion to the talk page and waited. There was no response, so I made the minimal change.
 * There is no change to the substance, rather only to what Wikipedia calls the concept. If you have a reason to use teh conspiracy label, please explain it to me.
 * Also as a non-regular, I am unable to comment on your talk page. 42.3.184.152 (talk) 23:35, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Golden Billion response
Calling the ideas of others a conspiracy theory seems to be very judgemental and biased. In some cases it is justified. However this concept is not far removed from other political theories. It doesn't depend of a belief in some secret agenda by some unknown cabal. Instead it is a way of seeing the developed world as being selfish and exploitative. So I posted my suggestion to the talk page and waited. There was no response, so I made the minimal change.

There is no change to the substance, rather only to what Wikipedia calls the concept. If you have a reason to use teh conspiracy label, please explain it to me.

Also as a non-regular, I am unable to comment on your talk page.