User talk:42800141

Hello !
Could you explain me, why did you published the lists of the Global Fire Page, behaving in a way that does not respect the site, deleting the data of Credit Suisse, please do not keep doing the vandal  in this page, Can you explain why you did it?--LuigiPortaro29 (talk) 14:03, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --LuigiPortaro29 (talk) 22:37, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. --LuigiPortaro29 (talk) 00:09, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Edit warring notice List of countries by Military Strength Index
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on List of countries by Military Strength Index. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 01:48, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please respect the publications of the author
I would suggest you respect the author Publications of Credit Suisse, the publications of Credit Suisse  come out every year or two years, depending the publication that comes out as in the case of "The Credit Suisse Gender 3000 published in 2014 and updated in October of this year.  . In fact, we should wait until October 2017 to see the new military index data since the numbers for each country are  very complex.--LuigiPortaro29 09:44, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Stop Vandalism
Please stop making disruptive edits. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --LuigiPortaro29 23:37, 22 November 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by LuigiPortaro29 (talk • contribs)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

October 2017
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Geography of India does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks!--ז62 (talk) 15:37, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Your attention needed at WP:CHU
Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. — k6ka  🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 13:29, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Image spam
Pls read over MOS:IMAGES.--Moxy (talk) 04:16, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

February 2018
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Australia. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 20:17, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * You have been warned about edit-warring before. Per WP:BRD, when an edit of yours is good-faith reverted, don't edit war over it. Discuss it on the article's talk page and seek consensus for your edits, as you have been asked to do. Note that, per WP:STATUSQUO the status quo remains while discussion is underway. This is especially true at Australia, which is a featured article. Failure to do so, and simply restoring your edits without attempting to gain consensus, will likely result in a block. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 20:23, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Australia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 20:26, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * This edit clearly indicates that you are not interested in discussion and would prefer to edit-war. Please note that, as you have made 3 reverts already, another will result in a 3RR breach. Please note that it is not up to other editors to justify retention of the correct map, it is up to you to justify your changes. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 20:30, 21 February 2018 (UTC)