User talk:43.241.132.78

Your submission at Articles for creation: Codingal (September 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by JSFarman were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Codingal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Codingal Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JSFarman&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Codingal reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JSFarman (talk) 05:12, 8 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi Julie, Thank you for reviewing the AfC. I think the references from The Hindu, India Today, VCCircle, EdTechReview, Entrepreneur.com, The Economic Times (which is a part of The Times of India group) and Mint are all reliable sources.
 * The article has been rewritten to meet the Neutral Point of View.
 * Can you please guide me more. Thank you for your support. 43.241.132.78 (talk) 13:40, 9 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi and apologies on the delay. I only just came across your note. If you're leaving a message for another editor, they will not be notified unless you ping them by username.   (For example: JSFarman .)


 * Your edit is good but notability has not yet been established. If an article is based on a press release it isn't considered independent. The Economic Times and Mint are both based on a press release -- they use the same quote from the COO (as do other articles via less-reliable sources).  The Entreprenuer article is written by a contributor, not a staff member, and, as such, is not considered reliable.  It's hard to take ANI seriously given the issues with the content (repeated sentences, etc). Coverage needs to be extensive, and of the seven references from The Hindu, only one has signficant editorial on Codingal.  The other references are via niche or trade publications as far as I can tell.


 * Sorry I can't be of more help.  Thanks for the message.  JSFarman (talk) 20:36, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for block evasion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bilby (talk) 21:31, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.