User talk:43.248.55.145

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions&#32;so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply  [ create a named account] . It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (43.248.55.145) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! Bhunacat10 (talk),  10:45, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Reflists
Please stop changing reflist|30em to reflist. The figure is designed to make the reference list display better on mobile devices. Akld guy (talk) 21:36, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Not true, - actually, the template was recently amended to generate columns automatically, so in most instances this is no longer needed. However, I don't do it as the sole edit to a page - just if I notice it while perfoming other tasks. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:49, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi Diannaa, you are correct as I discovered after posting the above. Akld guy (talk) 21:06, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to History of US science fiction and fantasy magazines to 1950— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Wikipelli Talk  13:15, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at State Council of the People's Republic of China. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. aboideautalk 17:10, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Eternal leaders of North Korea, you may be blocked from editing. Jeb3 Talk at me here  17:24, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at United States dollar. ZLEA T \ C 19:29, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2019
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 14:38, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

About references
I think this section "Sources" (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joshua_Wong&diff=next&oldid=902227902) may deleted at all? — because Wikipedia editing rule (Verifiability) doesn't allow to reference on its own Wikipedia pages (as there notice that information might draw some details from Chinese Wikipedia page). There exist some template for referencing on Wikipedia pages in other Wikipedia languages, like Template:Expand language (it's for stubs mostly) or Template:Translated page (this translator usually places), but it looks there no need for them either. PoetVeches (talk) 15:54, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
Hello, I'm Kerry Raymond. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, St John's Anglican Church, Newcastle, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kerry (talk) 07:14, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Thirty-nine Articles, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 13:47, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 15:54, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

June 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Duhu has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:21, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Duhu was changed by 43.248.55.145 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.867364 on 2019-06-23T17:21:22+00:00

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Panchen Lama. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.-- Tærkast (Discuss) 21:12, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Your editing on "Joshua Wong" without edit summary was reverted
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joshua_Wong&diff=prev&oldid=903440570) does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. You make little edit changes without explanation. It may looks like a bit disruptive and confusing. So, I decided to revert that. You can ask how to write edit summary me or the Teahouse. PoetVeches (talk) 22:08, 26 June 2019 (UTC)