User talk:43.249.196.218

April 2023
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Banker's lamp. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Marleeashton (talk) 06:41, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

i removed them intentially you fool. Look at the ****** article! It is long enough. . THis is why I stopped editing. 06:42, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass other editors, as you did at User talk:43.249.196.218. Liliana UwU (talk / contributions) 06:44, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Category:Types of lamp. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Marleeashton (talk) 06:48, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Woodlands Church, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Marleeashton (talk) 06:53, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Equine-man (talk) 06:48, 22 April 2023 (UTC)


 * You are part of the decline observed of Wikipedia. It should not be a battleground or used as social media.  All efforts should be put towards building the resource.  Sure,  I was rather cross and I broke WP:3RR but the state of WP really saddens me.  43.249.196.218 (talk) 08:32, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Auto category TOC
Category can be used for pages between 101 - 1200. Not 200 as you stated. Equine-man (talk) 07:14, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Your comment does not make sense grammatically but I think I get your drift. Now would you not agree that the template is redundant if there are no additional pages that can be viewed? 43.249.196.218 (talk) 08:27, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The purpose of the table of contents is to reduce the amount of scrolling the reader has to do to navigate between the sections of a page.
 * I'm guessing you were viewing the page on a big screen device, so you were able to navigate between sections without it effortlessly anyways. If that is the case, please keep in mind that not all readers out there have devices with large displays or view Wikipedia on them like you do. There may be viewers out there reading it on a small laptop, on a tablet, mobile phone, etc. In fact, mobile phone users make up a sizable share of the Wikipedia readers out there.
 * You may find the category TOC box useless, but there will surely be readers out there on mobile phones who won't find it to be so.
 * Additionally, the documentation of the Auto category TOC template (which you can find here) itself states that it may be used on categories ranging from 101 up to 1200 links.
 * In response to your other query, when you make a bold edit, and it is reverted, the onus is on you to start a discussion on the article talk page about why the edit makes sense / should be restored etc, and not on the other editor after restoring your edit back again which you hadn't gotten consensus for in the first place. See BOLD, revert, discuss cycle for a good explanation of this. Furthermore, when your edits become reverted by multiple other editors (and you are the only one in support of your edits), then it becomes clear that the consensus is against your edits. You will need to discuss on the article's talk page to establish a consensus with those other editors.
 * Hope this helps. — AP 499D25  (talk)  10:28, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. 331dot (talk) 08:12, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.