User talk:43tt54yty

March 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Newcastle upon Tyne has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Newcastle upon Tyne was changed by 43tt54yty (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963669 on 2015-03-05T09:39:12+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:39, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Godalming. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Godalming was changed by 43tt54yty (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952763 on 2015-03-05T09:41:29+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:41, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Got no ground


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Got no ground requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dai Pritchard (talk) 09:44, 5 March 2015 (UTC)