User talk:45.123.119.51

Questionable content
Hi there, I have reverted these changes of yours. I can't tell if this is a reading comprehension issue, or if you're being deliberately disruptive, but this source doesn't say anything about the budget of Azhagiya Tamil Magan. The only mention of this film is at the very bottom where it says "Future projects: Azhagiya Tamil Magan". You also restored "Vijay credited Rahman's soundtrack and background score was the major reason for the film's success". This was attributed to this Filmibeat interview, where Vijay says "Definitely, the music of Rahman is the major plus point of ATM." Where in that quotation does it say anything about the success of the film? From my interpretation, Vijay is saying that he likes the music and thinks that it is a major attraction for the film. Also, totally unclear what "success" means in this context, since that could relate to financial success, critical success, success with the audience. Vague, and that's the problem with interpretive content, and why we shouldn't be presenting opinions as facts. Further, it's someone who is involved with the film, praising aspects of the film. That's self-aggrandisement, which is inherently promotional and meaningless from an academic perspective. We should be including critical responses and analyses of people who are independent of the film. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:38, 1 March 2021 (UTC)


 * This source you added here is not reliable. Go through WP:ICTF, WP:ICTFFAQ and WP:RSP, WP:RS to know more abut reliable sources. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:12, 3 March 2021 (UTC)