User talk:45.188.165.254

October 2023
Hello, I'm Yoshi24517. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Latinx—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.  Yoshi24517 ( Chat ) ( Online ) 02:40, 7 October 2023 (UTC)


 * As Yoshi said above, please be sure your edits are cited and meet NPOV. Thank you! - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 02:42, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for making it clear that you are racist. This is a racial slur and we wont rest until it´s clear for everyone out there. 45.188.165.254 (talk) 02:46, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Let me know about this
 * Social controversy and cultural appropriation
 * Latinx is considered by many groups of Spanish-speaking people as a term of racism or cultural appropriation, due to its origins as a word imposed by non-Spanish-speaking groups, interfering in the linguistic and cultural rules of the Spanish language and its culture, ensuring the integration of rules. more typical of English than of the Spanish language.
 * Many groups discourage the use of this term because it directly promotes the non-visualization of women in fields where there have historically been problems with female representation.
 * There are many groups that have expressed the rejection of this word and recommend the correct use to refer to groups of Spanish-speaking origins as "Latinos or "Hispanics" by correctly following the rules of neutrality in the language. Using as the main argument that the main Promoters of the word Latinx are non-Hispanic groups generally speaking English, not having an objective of use as an integration into the English language because in that language the correct use would be Latins, but as an interference of these groups by altering the pronunciation and writing the word in Spanish 45.188.165.254 (talk) 03:07, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 02:45, 7 October 2023 (UTC)


 * "Latinx" is like the N word to us, why we have to tolerate it? 45.188.165.254 (talk) 02:48, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Even if i write this is wrong?
 * Social controversy and cultural appropriation
 * Latinx is considered by many groups of Spanish-speaking people as a term of racism or cultural appropriation, due to its origins as a word imposed by non-Spanish-speaking groups, interfering in the linguistic and cultural rules of the Spanish language and its culture, ensuring the integration of rules. more typical of English than of the Spanish language.
 * Many groups discourage the use of this term because it directly promotes the non-visualization of women in fields where there have historically been problems with female representation. 24​
 * There are many groups that have expressed the rejection of this word and recommend the correct use to refer to groups of Spanish-speaking origins as "Latinos or "Hispanics" by correctly following the rules of neutrality in the language. Using as the main argument that the main Promoters of the word Latinx are non-Hispanic groups generally speaking English, not having an objective of use as an integration into the English language because in that language the correct use would be Latins, but as an interference of these groups by altering the pronunciation and writing the word in Spanish. 45.188.165.254 (talk) 03:06, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 02:52, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
 * If you're going to block this one, should also do 152.203.243.147; they're a tag-team making the same "racist" edit to the same page over and over again.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  05:41, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 * PS: The noob accounts Radlizard92 and Jundeex are also in on it, robotically. Probably either all the same user, or a tagteam ginned up on some off-site forum. And 160.20.246.2, and 2806:2a0:41a:8059:45b0:a45b:20a:471e, and 189.216.27.111, and 181.115.6.42. So far. This seems to be a coordinated effort to overwhelming the ability of watchlisters to keep up with them.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  05:47, 7 October 2023 (UTC)