User talk:45.249.169.10

March 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ranam (2018 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Let There Be Sunshine 17:05, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Ranam (2018 film). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''Diff: Please don't resubmit unsourced content and please don't arbitrarily reorder cast. This just looks like you're entertaining your personal preference rather than going off of some official source like the film's on-screen credits.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:48, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. -- Let There Be Sunshine 14:14, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Kammara Sambhavam, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Let There Be Sunshine 14:56, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Arbitrary reordering of cast (2nd notice) and unsourced content (2nd notice)
Again, please stop arbitrarily reordering cast as you've done here, and please stop submitting unsourced content like this unsourced birthdate. Additionally, this sort of edit, where you opine about a film's "huge" cult following is inappropriate for inclusion as it fails our Neutral Point of View policy, isn't appropriate tone, and appears to be your personal opinion. Same thing here, where you introduce unacceptable commentary about a film being a "blockbuster" (which is meaningless hyperbolic language unsuitable for an encyclopedia) and that it has attained a "cult status". If the definition of a "cult film" is that a film has a small but loyal fanbase, virtually every film ever created is a "cult film". This is meaningless puffery, particularly when not supported by ample references. You've made some constructive changes elsewhere, so it would be unfortunate if your editing privileges were interrupted to prevent damage like this. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:10, 21 March 2018 (UTC)