User talk:45.43.14.94

August 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Khurshidbanu Natavan, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

1. I did not add anything new to the article but fixed the statement according to the sources and removed the original research. 2. You are removing properly attributed factual information about the fact that the tomb of the Khurshidbanu Natavan located in the Imarat Cemetery was destroyed. The fact that cemetery was destroyed and looted was also confirmed by the US State Department: "According to the US Department of State, the sacred and historic 18th-century tombs of Imarat Garvand Cemetery, the city's "Martyrs' Alley," were among the cemeteries throughout Aghdam that had been desecrated, looted, or destroyed. Western diplomats who visited Martyrs' Alley reported that there were holes where bodies had formerly been interred and that there was just one damaged tombstone left in the cemetery."

3. Reza Deghati is a well-known photojournalist. His work has been produced by National Geographic Television; he won an Emmy Award and also served as Creative Director for National Geographic's most viewed documentary. His works were even referenced by US Department of State. When it comes to the material, it is correctly attributed and cited from the source, which was posted by Reza. It also contains factual images demonstrating the before and after conditions of the Imarat cemetery.

You did not provide any reasoning on why properly attributed FACTUAL information supported by the NUMBER OF PHOTOS is not reliable. So its you personal opinion. If you wish you can take it to RSN, and if you get consensus that information is not reliable - then you can remove it. For now I reverting your edit.

--Abrvagl (talk) 15:32, 14 August 2022 (UTC)