User talk:45.48.15.139

March 2021
Hello, I'm CalliPatra. I noticed that you have repeatedly reverted my edits on Livi Zheng and Ken Zheng with similar notes that the current versions of both pages contain unverifiable information, which is false. Both the GeoTimes and Tirto.id articles you took issues with had been removed as references on the pages and all information as is are supported by credible, verifiable sources. Please note that Wikipedia is not a platform for self-promotion and/or advertisement, which you seem to be doing with the articles. All biography articles contain information -- positive or negative -- about the subject of the article to provide accurate depiction of who the individuals are as public figures. Please do not edit Wikipedia articles based on favoritism or personal connections. If you have different information than what is contained in a page, please edit ONLY the parts that you find to be inaccurate, not the entire article. Information from sources that are user-generated and are not/minimally moderated to maintain accuracy should not be used. Again, Wikipedia is not a platform for self promotion and/or advertisement. If your disruption continues, you will be reported to administrators. CalliPatra (talk) 10:09, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Warning for multiple reverts
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CalliPatra (talk) 08:16, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. CalliPatra (talk) 04:56, 16 March 2021 (UTC)