User talk:45.50.164.192

June 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Ethnicities in Iran, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 04:51, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Germany–Iran relations, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.  GoldMiner24 Talk 00:16, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello, I'm Mako001. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Russian invasion of Manchuria—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 01:39, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

March 2023
Hello, I'm 47.227.95.73. I noticed that you recently removed content from Benjamin Mendy without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 22:18, 16 March 2023 (UTC) 47.227.95.73 (talk) 22:18, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Anti-imperialism, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Jayjg (talk) 21:21, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Infidel, you may be blocked from editing. Vozul (talk) 01:36, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Israel national football team - edit warring is prohibited
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Let's discuss this on the article's Talk page. 2A0D:6FC0:1FAB:F300:D002:893F:8487:1D20 (talk) 00:33, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
Hello, I'm Egghead06. I noticed that you recently removed content from Islam in association football without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Egghead06 (talk) 05:57, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
Hi 45.50.164.192! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. — Manti  core  04:45, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on United States v Iran (1998 FIFA World Cup). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. —  Manti  core  02:46, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Iraq–United States relations, you may be blocked from editing. — Manti  core  03:13, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

June 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Siege of Narbonne (737), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Knowledgegatherer23 ( Say Hello ) 21:28, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi 45.50.164.192! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Nellie massacre several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Untamed1910 (talk) 21:38, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Untamed1910 (talk) 02:47, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

June 2023
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:27, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.


 * You need to stop doing that, You are edit warring again that lead to your previous block. if you keep edit warring then your next block will be way longer Untamed1910 (talk) 23:36, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of one month for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 05:32, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Third Anglo-Afghan War, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:17, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at India–Pakistan sports rivalries. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Remember: Wikipedia is not censored. GenoV84 (talk) 09:00, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at India–Pakistan sports rivalries, you may be blocked from editing. GenoV84 (talk) 02:52, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Izno (talk) 22:04, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

February 2024
Hello, I'm Marcus Markup. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Abe (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Marcus Markup (talk) 09:21, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 15:11, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.