User talk:46.188.178.195

February 2024
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Joy (talk) 10:20, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

You have recently made edits related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe. This is a standard message to inform you that the Balkans or Eastern Europe is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Contentious topics.

--Joy (talk) 10:21, 6 February 2024 (UTC)


 * You are constantly disrupting editing while I try to insert quotes from main article - Republic of Ragusa. Except that you don't cite any sources and tend to replace original text "Croatian" with "Slavic". 46.188.178.195 (talk) 10:28, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Your edit here added the list of authors, but the only citation was for the final sentence about Morlachism; the same list already existed in the Republic of Ragusa article, where it had been added by User:Kubura with this edit in 2005, and has been tagged with a citation request since 2018. In the meantime, we found how that user has systematically abused Wikipedia to the extent that they had to be globally banned. Do not be surprised when copying that content around without carrying over citation tags is treated as very suspect. I see that you since provided new citations for that text, but that doesn't mean that the rules of decorum described at WP:ARBMAC do not apply. Editing the article about the Serb Catholic movement to spam it with lists of Croats is obviously going to be controversial and you need to treat the issue with due diligence. --Joy (talk) 12:26, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Republic of Ragusa article is the main article about history of Dubrovnik and I see noe reason why it shouldn't be reffered. None of your statements had any sources quoted. After my edit YOU have changed every mention of "Croatian" to "Slavic", and I wouldn't be suprised if you later change it to "Serbian". Statements like "Editing the article about the Serb Catholic movement to spam it with lists of Croats" tells me you're promoting a Greater Serbian agenda on Wikipedia. Should I treat your action as very suspect? 46.188.178.195 (talk) 13:52, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Making increasingly absurd claims is a great way to prove you're not actually here to build an encyclopedia. You've been notified of the rules of decorum a sufficient number of times already; further violations will lead to a block. --Joy (talk) 21:07, 6 February 2024 (UTC)