User talk:46.189.28.77

June 2018
Do not use multiple IP addresses to vandalize Wikipedia, like you did at Tetraethyllead. Such attempts to avoid detection or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia '''you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''' Binksternet (talk) 06:05, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Welcome and a request
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. It's good to see a new editor tacking the surfactant pages, many of those need expert attention. While you are editing could I please ask that you leave edit summaries, as that makes it easier for us to keep track of what's going on. --Project Osprey (talk) 12:42, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Shellwood. I noticed that in this edit to Phytosterol, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 10:19, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Phytosterol, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:03, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Marin Barleti, you may be blocked from editing. Donner60 (talk) 03:18, 30 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Sourced content cannot be deleted as "dubious." If the source is invalid, explain it on the talk page or cite a competing source. Even then, the contrary view cannot be deleted unless it is shown to be false. Inserting a dubious tag in proper format could be done, but not if the only reason for it is that you disagree with it and do not have a contrary source to cite. See Neutral point of view and Verifiability. Donner60 (talk) 03:21, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Salt (chemistry). Home Lander (talk) 18:14, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market
You're cutting too much. In principle almost everything can be googled. Drmies (talk) 01:56, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Monoacylglycerol lipase
Your edits on the above linked article were not helpful and have been reverted. Boghog (talk) 21:16, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Agile testing
Try It makes those ugly hat cleanup tags prettier! Thanks for all your contributions. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 10:49, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I removed the template. There are technical terms in the article, but I have no idea which terms you think are buzzwords. An explanation on the article's talk page is needed to understand. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:46, 8 July 2018 (UTC)