User talk:46.20.37.133

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Hundred Year's War. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wilfridselsey (talk) 17:10, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

January 2015
Hello, I'm Valenciano. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Faithful Word Baptist Church seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Valenciano (talk) 21:21, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Faithful Word Baptist Church. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Valenciano (talk) 21:26, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

NPOV noticeboard
Please see Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard for a discussion of the problems with your recent edits. Valenciano (talk) 21:33, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015
Your recent editing history at Faithful Word Baptist Church shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - MrX 21:43, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Faithful Word Baptist Church, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Faithful Word Baptist Church was changed by 46.20.37.133 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958871 on 2015-01-02T22:06:34+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:06, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Southern Poverty Law Center. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 22:12, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.