User talk:46.208.236.192

October 2019
Hello, I'm Ȝeſtikl. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Girl Who Had Everything have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Ȝeſtikl (talk) 10:38, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * Did you even look at the text you put back? 46.208.236.192 (talk) 10:39, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, I did. If you meant the text’s appearance, I fixed it.  If you mean the content, please fix what you think is incorrect. Thank you. Ȝeſtikl (talk) 10:47, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Did you not notice the grammatical howler in the first sentence? Did you not perceive the unencyclopaedic tone throughout? 46.208.236.192 (talk) 10:57, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 * As I said, please correct it, not blank it. Ȝeſtikl (talk) 11:00, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 * You can add well-written encyclopaedic text if you like. I am under no obligation to. 46.208.236.192 (talk) 11:02, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Ok, then. Ȝeſtikl (talk) 11:04, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

“Unenclycopedic Rubbish”
Hi, 46. I would like to know why you consider a plot summary, like the one at The Girl Who Had Everything, “Unenclycopedic Rubbish.” Otherwise, your edits appear as vandalism, which is why I reverted them. Ȝeſtikl (talk) 10:42, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 * See the question I asked you above. 46.208.236.192 (talk) 10:43, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. 331dot (talk) 11:27, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

You continued to edit war despite my warning; I have blocked you. Being correct is not a defense to edit warring; instead of edit warring, please use proper processes to address what you see as problematic edits. Further edit warring after the block will result in longer blocks. 331dot (talk) 11:28, 6 October 2019 (UTC)