User talk:46.211.32.94

January 2021
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Hubble Space Telescope—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 13:23, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Hubble Space Telescope. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please see MOS:CONTRACTIONS for Wikipedia's guidelines on using contractions. —DanCherek (talk) 13:59, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I see you have again reverted the Hubble article, changing was not to wasn't. While wasn't might be universal in speech, in formal writing was not is preferred. DanCherak has asked you above to read Wikipedia's manual of style with regard to contractions, see above link. Please can you stop it now? IdreamofJeanie (talk) 14:14, 9 January 2021 (UTC)


 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hubble Space Telescope, you may be blocked from editing. —DanCherek (talk) 14:20, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.