User talk:46.226.184.121

March 2023
Hello, I'm AgisdeSparte. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Mission golden-eyed tree frog—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. AgisdeSparte (talk) 17:32, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mission golden-eyed tree frog. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sheep (talk • he/him) 17:47, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to engage in subtle vandalism by making unexplained changes to information, as you did at Mission golden-eyed tree frog, you may be blocked from editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 18:09, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

frogs
We noticed you're making contributions on an article about which you seem both knowledgeable and passionate, frogs. Thanks for helping! A friendly suggestion: approach your addition to the encyclopedia as though it were an important school assignment worthy of your precious time. Gather your sources, scribble a draft, let someone suggest edits, write it all down, tidy it all up, make sure it's sourced (make dam'd sure it's sourced) and the changes you're attempting will likely find a way into the article, given both factual and appropriately sourced. Thanks again for building a truly unique encyclopedia, Saintstephen000 (talk) 17:38, 23 March 2023 (UTC)