User talk:46.226.49.236

September 2016
Hello, I'm Denisarona. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Dominant minority, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 12:25, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Sunmist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Baldwin I of Jerusalem— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sunmist (talk) 08:34, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hashim Amla, you may be blocked from editing. KylieTastic (talk) 19:05, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2016
Hello, I'm IdreamofJeanie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Why did the chicken cross the road? have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 11:18, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2016
Hello. I noticed that you made an edit that introduces praise or promotional language to the Leeds Ladies F.C. article. On Wikipedia, we adhere to a neutral point of view (NPOV) and avoid promotional language or puffery. Please read the NPOV policy page, as well as this page of language to avoid to better understand how to expand this article in a style suitable to an encyclopedia. If you have questions, please see the Help Desk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 00:48, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello, I'm Gilliam. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Phil Babb, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! – Gilliam (talk) 14:22, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2017
Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to AC Omonia have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 14:28, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to AC Omonia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 15:38, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello, I'm Bennv3771. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Cream tea have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Bennv3771 (talk) 07:28, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2017
Hello, I'm Jim1138. An edit you recently made to John Williams seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 09:30, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page The Vapors has been reverted. Your edit here to The Vapors was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.twitter.com/vaporsofficial) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:09, 22 September 2017 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   14:12, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Gerber Baby, you may be blocked from editing. Simplexity22 (talk) 06:12, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Talkback
Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 11:43, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to List of oldest stars— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 12:49, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi - I was correcting the mistake in the list - the referring Wikipedia page and indeed the research paper on Arxiv state that the age is +- 4 billion years, not 0.4 billion years. As such, I believe that my edit should stand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aeonturnip (talk • contribs) 12:53, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to The New School at West Heath— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 13:32, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The New School at West Heath. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 13:33, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The New School at West Heath, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 13:34, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The New School at West Heath. Shellwood (talk) 13:34, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 13:45, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.