User talk:46.233.77.157

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the ones you made to Denzel Washington. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply  [ create a named account] . It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a minimum number of days and made a minimum number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (46.233.77.157) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! No Great Shaker (talk) 07:27, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Why your post keeps getting removed
On the microscopic chance you're not just WP:BKFIP again, Berean Hunter's edits where reverting a sockpuppet of a community banned user per WP:BANREVERT. Any other non-banned editor would be free to undo those edits. Should BH have been more careful? Maybe, but the user behind BKFIP should also fuck off.

That said, anyone who knows how to hunt for diffs the way you do should also be familiar with WP:BANREVERT and WP:NOTVAND anyway, so I highly doubt your report was in good faith.

You were given an explanation -- Don't feed the trolls.

If you "really" are not that long-term abuse case (or some other one), then stop acting like it. It's that simple. Ian.thomson (talk) 08:34, 25 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Adding the text "Do Not trust wikipedia" to Wikipedia is an act of vandalism. There are no circumstances in which this is not true. I reported this destructive behaviour in good faith.
 * In what possible way am I acting like a long-term abuse case? What you know about me is that I edited 16 articles to improve them, clearly linking to the policies and guidelines that I was following, and then reported an act of vandalism that I had noticed.
 * "the user behind BKFIP should also fuck off" - maybe so. They have clearly made you very angry. What possible reason to you have to imagine that I am something to do with them? 46.233.77.157 (talk) 08:45, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * "You were given an explanation -- Don't feed the trolls" - that is not an explanation that anyone gave me, nor is it even an explanation at all. It is a personal attack that you have made against me. 46.233.77.157 (talk) 08:45, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Unblock request

 * To note: I've now noticed that the administrator carried out one of their acts of vandalism not once but twice. The instance I reported came two days after the first time they did it: . Adding the text "Do Not trust wikipedia" to Wikipedia once is bad enough; doing it twice? Unbelievable. 46.233.77.157 (talk) 08:51, 25 January 2020 (UTC)