User talk:46.234.205.173

April 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of DuckTales (2017 TV series) episodes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talian dialect. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~ 🌀 Hurricane Covid 🌀 13:51, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Please stop making your changes without some sort of justification or it will be considered vandalism. Thank you. --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106; &#x1D110;&#x1d107; 22:02, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Hello. I have noticed that you edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Megaman en m (talk) 20:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
You have had repeated warnings. Your edits to Latin declension to change vir and virus to uir and uirus are not credible as a mistake or misunderstanding. You actually managed to leave an edit note this time, where you said that u and v were the same in latin. No. U was written as V. V was never written as U. So ...

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Latin declension, you may be blocked from editing. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 19:40, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Romance languages. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 19:47, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at English orthography. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Megaman en m (talk) 05:10, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

February 2023
Hello, I'm Mathglot. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Spanish orthography, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please see Wikipedia's policy on WP:Verifiability, through the use of citations to reliable sources, and Help:Footnotes. Mathglot (talk) 01:29, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruption on language articles
I undid your edits on another six articles because of lack of sourcing. I also looked at your changes over the last two months, and as far as I can tell, with the exception of some changes to some tables to shift column data around, all of your edits to language articles lack sources, and most have already been reverted. Spot checking further back over six months, it looks like you never provide sources. This is WP:DISRUPTIVE to the encyclopedia, and you must provide sources for your edits, or risk having your editing privileges suspended, or removed. Mathglot (talk) 01:47, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Japanese phonology. Nardog (talk) 23:32, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

October 2023
Hello! I'm Jc3s5h. Your recent edit(s) to the page International System of Units appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jc3s5h (talk) 23:54, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Your recent changes to German orthography
Hello, I'm Timefordindins. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to German orthography have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Timefordindins (talk) 02:45, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Wade–Giles
$⟨hs⟩$ is the correct transcription for /ɕ/ in Wade–Giles. Please do not change it to $⟨sh⟩$ in articles, that is incorrect. Remsense 诉  16:41, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bopomofo. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Again: $⟨hs⟩$ is how /ɕ/ is written in Wade–Giles. Please stop changing it. Remsense 诉  16:47, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.