User talk:46.253.41.160

April 2021
Hello, I'm AeschyIus. I noticed that in this edit to 2019 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. aeschyIus (talk) 20:04, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Danny Julian Boggs, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 22:03, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at 2019 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Samuel Alito, you may be blocked from editing. Fritzmann (message me) 19:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at 2019 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Clarence Thomas. Fritzmann (message me) 19:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Regarding your report to the false positives page
You recently made a report to the edit filter false positives reports page. However, the edit you were attempting to make was not acceptable under Wikipedia's current policies and guidelines. I would invite you to read how Wikipedia is not censored. You've listed reasoning for your edits as a "violation of the privacy laws of Italy", however, this does not apply, since the policy I've linked states, and I quote, "Content will be removed if it is judged to violate Wikipedia policies (especially those on biographies of living persons and neutral point of view) or the laws of the United States". No mention is made regarding the laws of Italy, and so your edit constitutes the blanking of a page.

If you believe there are valid reasons for the page to be removed, you are welcome to open a deletion discussion with proper arguments in favor of its removal that utilize policy and/or guidelines currently existing on Wikipedia. EggRoll97 (talk) 21:14, 28 April 2021 (UTC)