User talk:46.39.229.207

May 2018
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 18:02, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Could you please specify *exact* parts of my additions, where it's unsourced in your opinion? Since every bit was provided with reference link last time. Also could you please stop deleting parts of text with provided sources, if you have problems with only some bits of information.

I was not saying the publisher was lying about anything. I was saying that the republishing is not significant and does not belong in the article if the only source is the publishers website. It is just spam trying to promote the book. Both times I removed it that is what I said. ~ GB fan 23:31, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as done at Bram Stoker's Dracula. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:27, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.