User talk:47.149.20.72

August 2021
Hello, I'm Finneus. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Yellowstone Caldera—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Finn! (talk) 19:24, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Your edit to List of Lucifer characters has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. DanCherek (talk) 20:25, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Four kingdoms of Daniel. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Rdp060707&#124;talk 04:17, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ark of the Covenant, you may be blocked from editing. Rdp060707&#124;talk 05:38, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Rdp060707&#124;talk 08:25, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 13:03, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ballistic missile submarine. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CodeTalker (talk) 03:17, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at New Testament. Rdp060707&#124;talk 05:10, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

==Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian FederationR-29 Vysota/RSM-40Russia hidden submarines in the Pacific Ocean==

A tag has been placed on Draft:General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian FederationR-29 Vysota/RSM-40Russia hidden submarines in the Pacific Ocean, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BilCat (talk) 03:41, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ©Geni (talk) 05:38, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Ancient of Days, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jan Myšák (talk) 11:24, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. --   LuK3      (Talk)   17:46, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
 * I have increased the duration to 1 month (the duration of disruption since the last block) because it resumes when prior blocks expire. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:48, 28 September 2021 (UTC)