User talk:47.149.214.237

Welcome!
Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 03:24, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello, I'm Sea Cow. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Network (1976 film), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sea Cow (talk) 19:08, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
Hello, I'm Pulpfiction621. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to The Green Knight (film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Pulpfiction621 (talk) 17:53, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at The Quick and the Dead (1995 film), you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 22:24, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at The Quick and the Dead (1995 film). Binksternet (talk) 00:21, 16 August 2022 (UTC)


 * What original research? The films I cited have the content I described. How is this "unpublished information"? And what constitutes "personal analysis"? I didn't express any emotional feelings, I just noted some prominent resemblances between films (and actresses).
 * Too, there are other places on the Internet noting "Hannie Caulder" as a precedent for "The Quick and the Dead". So I'm not just hallucinating. Given the strong resemblance of the latter film to the former, it would be misleading for people *not* to know about the former film.
 * If you let me know, say, how I can present the information I did, in a better form maybe, I'd like to see. I am certainly willing to learn, where I need to do so. I know Wikipedia is a collaborative community, after all.
 * Have a wonderful evening, in any case. Thanks for your time. 47.149.214.237 (talk) 01:45, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the Election (1999 film) plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:30, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Please refrain from making changes to plot summaries/synopses that conflict with the plot summary edit guides, as you did at All Our Yesterdays (Star Trek: The Original Series). You may wish to review the specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. Excessive detail and high word counts should be avoided. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 03:24, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Election
Hi,

It's a small detail, but the little girl's hair is not blonde. The Youtube clip you posted has less contrast and more brightness than the DVD version I'm watching, and is also distorted vertically. The girl's hair is a brownish ginger. Tracy is also only occasionally seen in a headband. My real objection is that the point is clear without these clumsy details: the girl's behaviour parallels Tracy's, and that's clear without describing her (brownish ginger) hair, or her headband.

Best wishes, Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 00:46, 6 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Dear Jean-de-Nivelle:
 * Thanks for your observations. I guess there are different perceptions of color at different times. (As I said, "brownish-blonde" could be a description, not unlike the "brownish ginger" you mention.) ...I didn't think it hurt to mention a parallel I thought was there (blonde, or even the headband), but if people don't like it, then they don't.
 * Best, 47.149.214.237 (talk) 02:16, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Three Days of the Condor. ''Stop expanding plot sections to more than 700 words. See WP:FILMPLOT.'' Binksternet (talk) 20:23, 18 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I didn't know it was over 700 words. (Some articles have a notation at the top of the Plot section, listing the word count, but I didn't see one, if there was one.) 47.149.214.237 (talk) 20:28, 18 January 2023 (UTC)


 * I use one of the free online word count tools. They are all good enough for the task. Binksternet (talk) 20:43, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

New message from Facu-el Millo
—El Millo (talk) 07:27, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

February 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Babylon (2022 film)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 02:37, 24 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Are you sure about this? I reduced the number of words in the plot to 700, as I've been doing literally for months now. What was the exact purported problem? The person whose words I either eliminated or truncated (by turning "ate a live rat" or whatever into "animal-abusing", which is shorter), is a violator, not I, I think. Another frequent Babylon editor whose name I shan't mention, actually thanked me for my work on the page a while back. Thanks. Hope to hear soon. 47.149.214.237 (talk) 02:43, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Emily (2022 film), you may be blocked from editing. Happy Editing! -I Followed The Username Policy (talk) 19:19, 27 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Huh? I saw the film "Emily" just yesterday, and I saw what I saw. She has her arm tattooed, she uses opium, etc. If there is any particular error, please let me know, but I don't recall anything I wrote being in error. If any of the timing is off (e.g., she used opium earlier or later in the film than I write about its being), please let me know. Thanks. The film I saw yesterday is the best "source of content" imaginable: it *is* the content. 47.149.214.237 (talk) 19:43, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
 * You need a source, I'm Sorry, That's just how it works, wait a bit and maybe a source might pop up. Happy Editing! -I Followed The Username Policy (talk) 20:50, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Babylon edit
Hello. I also responded on my talk page, but I've reverted the warning I issued here in error. Thank you for your patience and for reaching out. Please feel free to restore the Babylon edit. violetwtf (talk) 02:27, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Babylon (2022 film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Professor Penguino (talk) 02:40, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sariel Xilo (talk) 22:47, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.