User talk:47.150.234.135

November 2021
Hello, I'm Uranium Site. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Charles H. Townes have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Uranium Site (talk) 18:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Charles H. Townes. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 18:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Charles H. Townes, you may be blocked from editing. Uranium Site (talk) 18:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Uranium Site (talk) 18:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Th78blue (They/Them/Their • talk) 21:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Nick Moyes (talk) 21:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.