User talk:47.153.247.29

No documentation?
There's obviously sources in the content you carelessly removed. Why do you keep removing it?  Liliana UwU  (talk / contributions) 15:19, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you.  Liliana UwU  (talk / contributions) 13:33, 19 January 2024 (UTC)


 * false and undocumented information is contained on this page and needs to be removed, it violates policy on self promotion 47.153.247.29 (talk) 15:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Nothing you removed qualifies for an exception from WP:3RR, so the block is warranted. —C.Fred (talk) 16:03, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
 * the block IS NOT warranted when the removal of certain information strictly violates WikiPolicy. There's no documentation of the claims. 47.153.247.29 (talk) 16:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Which numbered point of WP:3RRNO are you claiming that falls under? —C.Fred (talk) 16:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at John Muir Trail, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. It appears there is sources, and I am worried this is intentional, as you got a similar warning on your talk page about edits removing things, claiming no documentation. OnlyNano 17:36, 19 January 2024 (UTC)


 * My valid reasons are noted when the content was updated. 47.153.247.29 (talk) 17:42, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

the sources cited are promotional content with absolutely no archeological documentation to verify the claims made by "Jolie Varla." Wiki policy strictly forbids promotional content and does support fact based discussion. Until archeological sources are cited for this content the statements are misleading. 47.153.247.29 (talk) 17:41, 19 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Perhaps good points to be raised on the article's talk page. Click "Talk" above the article, then "New section" and explain, please. In detail, and especially in a way that may lead to others agreeing and implementing the edit on your behalf. You can invite them to the discussion as soon as you have started it, by clicking "Talk" next to their usernames, then "New section" and writing a short simple invitation to the article's talk page. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:59, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
 * It seems odd that I'm being required to disprove the claims by Jolie Varla and her self promotion of "Indigenous Women's Hike" when it appears that Jolie Varla needs to prove her points with archaeological evidence, supported and cited. All references to her claims cite articles from REI about a for profit hiking group, not actual substantiated archaeological evidence. 47.153.247.29 (talk) 21:03, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Additionally, I'm wondering why this was allowed in the first place when it's clearly NOT factual information. Unless its backed up by science then it shouldnt be allowed on this site. 47.153.247.29 (talk) 21:24, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
 * You are not required to "disprove" anything; you are required to find a consensus on the article's talk page before continuing to revert. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:56, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Did the references to "indigenous women's hike" and self promotion of Jolie Varlas hiking group as cited in #7,8,9 references receive consensus on the talk page? I don't see that it did. 47.153.247.29 (talk) 16:02, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (John Muir Trail) for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:51, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

False and misleading information
Wiki policy doesn't allow for self promotion on topics, as I explained numerous times there's no archeological evidence to support the claims by Jolie Varla, yet wiki is allowing false information on its page, the page needs to be updated omitting the self promotion of Jolie Varla and her "women's hike." 47.153.247.29 (talk) 17:29, 20 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Even if the Varla reference were removed, that doesn't address your removal of the Sierra Club reference. —C.Fred (talk) 16:06, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
 * The Sierra club reference doesn't discuss the JMT whatsoever, it's generalized article from a non-profit group that doesn't comply with USGS nomenclature policy. 47.153.247.29 (talk) 16:08, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Eh? From the first paragraph: The Me-wuk, Nüümü, Western Mono Waksachi, and Yokut Nations had a presence in areas traversed by the trail currently known as the John Muir Trail, which is also called Nüümü Poyo, “The People’s Road.”[emphasis added] Looks like that certainly discusses the JMT. —C.Fred (talk) 16:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC)