User talk:47.154.21.80

You deleted a factually accurate, and referenced section of a page. If those facts do not please you, read another page, do not call it bullshit and delete it.
 * "Factually accurate"? The edit is complete bullshit. Don't do it again, or I will block you. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:57, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

What is “bullshit” about referenced facts... You are the only one who seems to be politically motivated given your acts here, vandalizing the page. https://www.dailykos.com/blog/Muboshgu
 * Calling it a "controversy" that Rittenhouse has been charged with murder is your WP:POV, which is not widely shared. You also are quite selective in how you describe what happened, calling it self-defense when it hasn't been proven to be, and calling him a "17 year old boy" and not acknowledging that the minimum age to open carry is 18, or crossing state lines. And, the only reliable source you included doesn't mention Kaul at all. Don't add Rittenhouse to Kaul's page again. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:07, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

It is beyond dispute it is a controversy, the debate over his charging of Rittenhouse is all over the news. It is not disputed Rittenhouse was acting to defend himself, i.e. in self defense, the prosecutor’s charging document says that, as you can see. The edit did not say that the met the legal burden to excuse a homicide, which seems to be the what you are referring to, rather than the plain meaning of the words self defense or defending one’s self. He is 17, and under 18, and thus the common use of the word “boy” rather than “man”. You are incorrect about the minimum age to open carry, the restrictions you are referring to relates to various uses of a firearm. He did not cross state lines with the firearm, it was his friend’s, from that state, and it is legal to borrow a firearm. You just keep making threats to cover up your bullying to get your way, stick to the facts.
 * Kaul has done nothing controversial. Prosecutors who report to him did exactly what they should have done. It stays off of his page. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:38, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

It is not a huge controversy in the news? You are stating your opinion of whether his acts were right or wrong, and then openly deleting facts simply because you do not like them. Is this what is going on with Wikipedia? Disgusting. I have taken a picture of your comment. Your presence on Wikipedia will be successfully addressed.

Explain yourself, and restore what you did to the page.

September 2020
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Josh Kaul. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:38, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Josh Kaul. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:52, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.