User talk:47.155.41.201

Welcome!
Hi 47.155.41.201! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! 162.219.198.189 (talk) 11:22, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Thyroid
On my talk page, you said: ''Can you explain what the relevance of MOS:SECTION is to your revert? That is the specified way to create anchors to article sections, as described further down on that page and at WP:TARGET.''

Your edit within the section title was: "anchor" id="Colloid" and "anchor" id="Lumen"

It's not clear what you were trying to achieve. First, "colloid" and "lumen" are vague terms for a section on microanatomy. Second, if you want to direct a reader's attention to a relevant, strongly related article or subsection, you would use "See also" or "Main" positioned under the title. I don't think the "anchor" tool provides any utility here, and, in my experience, it is so rare I have not seen this in use before. Respond here. Zefr (talk) 00:29, 28 May 2023 (UTC)


 * I changed redirects to point to those anchors so readers would be redirected to the specific section describing those things instead of just the top of the article. The benefit of using anchors is redirects to an anchor will always go to the anchor's location in a page, even if moved later. Redirects to a section "break" if the section title is changed and then revert to going to top-of-page. My edit is what's produced by &#123;&#123;subst:anchor&#124;Colloid&#124;Lumen&#125;&#125;. 47.155.41.201 (talk) 01:37, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I understand your intent and the redirect formatting, but I still don't see this as logical or important for the common user. Go ahead and re-edit at the thyroid article. Good luck. Zefr (talk) 03:39, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Reply and... apology
Hi! Thank you for your message. I thought at the time that the link was redundant, but now I realise the point you were making. I'm sorry you were troubled. Regards, Technopat (talk) 09:27, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

New message from Bagumba
—Bagumba (talk) 07:26, 1 August 2023 (UTC)