User talk:47.157.129.133

Neutrality
Hi. Could I please ask that you read the Wikipedia policy on neutral point of view. Most of your edits seem to be in breach of this, and that's probably why they're being reverted. They read like part of a personal essay, see WP:NPOV, particuarly "...please do not use Wikipedia for any of the following:...Personal essays that state your particular feelings about a topic (rather than the opinions of experts). Although Wikipedia is supposed to compile human knowledge, it is not a vehicle to make personal opinions become part of such knowledge." Instead, you need to cite sources to justify your edit. Also, when you remove content, you need to justify doing so in you edit summary. Meticulo (talk) 03:53, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Why can't I help advocate for political change for the betterment of society? I am not the best English speaker. But I am close follower of American politics and speakers and watch the news to understand the issues and the betterment of society. 47.157.129.133 (talk) 04:00, 15 July 2021 (UTC)


 * You can't advocate for political change on Wikipedia in the way you currently are because, "Wikipedia is not a soapbox, a battleground, or a vehicle for propaganda...". See WP:SOAPBOX. Meticulo (talk) 05:57, 15 July 2021 (UTC)


 * This is an encyclopedia, not an advocacy site. You build on information and cite sources, not push for agendas. Discuss changes like this on talk pages and stop editing archives for this. 2603:8000:A501:9B00:DC17:700B:7469:F52B (talk) 01:20, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Being an encyclopedia and advocating for others are not mutually exclusive - in fact not allowing others to advocate is advocacy on your part for the capitalist status quo
 * The fact that nearly all of your edits have been reverted shows that you have no idea how this site works. 2603:8000:A501:9B00:64C1:D4D3:1696:F6BC (talk) 03:48, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Also stop using archives.

The fact you are the one reverting edits and then spamming me speaks volumes. You have no idea what you're talking about.


 * You are reported for disruptive and unconstructive edits, unsourced information, edit warring, inserting things into talk page archives instead of using the current talk pages, and refusing to listen to advices and warnings. 2603:8000:A501:9B00:4425:751C:D9BD:7885 (talk) 05:02, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Gray asexuality, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Rdp060707&#124;talk 06:58, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sam Harris. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:42, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Sam Harris a well known stepping stone to the alt-right, you can't deny this just because he never explicitly says stuff based on the people he interviews it caused YouTube algorithm to start recommending similar videos of the right wingers and before you know it they are spewing conspiracy theories, the role people like Sam Harris, Jordan Peterson and others play in radicalization must be acknowledged

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Gray asexuality, you may be blocked from editing. Notfrompedro (talk) 14:44, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Sam Harris. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 07:23, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Under-occupied developments in China. Baden-Paul (talk) 00:53, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Isabelle Belato. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Salad bowl (cultural idea), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Isabelle 🔔 13:28, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Vikipolimer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Comicsgate, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 𝗩𝗶𝗸𝗶𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗿 ℣ 02:57, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 04:18, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Self-coup has been reverted. Your edit here to Self-coup was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Galactic_Empire) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:11, 30 August 2021 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.2603:8000:A501:9B00:4425:751C:D9BD:7885 (talk) 04:45, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Second block
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for disruptive editing, including edit warring and subpar sourcing, coupled with aggressive WP:BATTLEGROUND conduct and competency lapses. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. El_C 05:32, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Hello, I'm Uranium Site. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bari Weiss, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Uranium Site (talk) 18:23, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm AngryHarpy. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Developing country, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Angry Harpy   talk 10:34, 25 October 2021 (UTC)