User talk:47.157.86.173

June 2017
The reason why I revert your edits is because MGM Interactive is defunct, and they don't publish games under that name anymore, instead just using the MGM logo and letting other companies publish their games. LTPofficial.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Animation, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 00:24, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Animation, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 00:29, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian again, as you did at User talk:FilmandTVFan28, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 00:39, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:22, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

October 2017
Regarding your edits to Hanna-Barbera -- you are right that Time Warner owns Hanna-Barbera and Warner Bros. However, if you look at the documentation at Template:Infobox company, the owner parameter is to be used to "list ownership percentages for private companies owned by a few key individuals or to list ownership percentages for joint ventures". Neither is applicable here. While Time Warner does own both companies, using the "owner" parameter on the Hanna-Barbera article is not proper for this context. Thanks, 青い(Aoi) (talk) 03:25, 5 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Also, please don't worry -- I don't think your editing is disruptive at all. I appreciate your edits to Hanna-Barbera and other articles; please don't let my reversion discourage you from continuing your edits. 青い(Aoi) (talk) 03:26, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Meters. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Warner Bros. Animation have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Why would we remove MGM Animation/Visual Arts from the see also just because their early catalog is owned by Turner? We list Turner, and MGM was listed as a subset of Turner. What's your justification for saying "MGM's animation studios are not allowed in the see also section because Turner owns the pre-May 1986 MGM library"? Meters (talk) 02:42, 20 October 2017 (UTC)