User talk:47.184.175.161

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions&#32;so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply  [ create a named account] . It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (47.184.175.161) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! JarrahTree 14:06, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

RE: Edits to Chinese Alligator
Hey there! I just wanted to let you know that in general it's bad practice to make unnecessary edits to sentence structure (i.e.: edits that don't increase clarity or fix errors, and are effectively just a way of restructuring the sentence that's already there). Many of your edits to the Chinese alligator article were of this unnecessary variety, and of those, some actually made things worse. For example, you changed "by people" to "by peopleby people" [sic], and conjoined the words "life cycle" into "lifecycle", which is a frequently made mistake that is incongruous with Wikipedia's own article on that matter.

However, I did want to note that your editing of "shelled prey" into "prey with shells" was kept because it did improve clarity somewhat; the adjective "shelled" could mean "prey with shells" or "prey whose shells have been removed", after all, though that confusion is unlikely to take root in the reader thanks to the context of the article. I just wanted to stop in and let you know about this general rule so you could continue to make edits with more of a critical eye. I wish you the best going forward. Happy editing! Crossark (talk) 00:14, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Edit: I would like to apologize for not also keeping your edit of "less distributed by people" to "disturbed less by people". The rearrangement wasn't necessary -- both are grammatically acceptable and, contrary to your quite incendiary remarks on my talk page, neither order is specifically endorsed by the manual of style. However, the correction of the spelling error was correctly made, so I was wrong to not preserve that change. Crossark (talk) 00:20, 27 December 2018 (UTC)