User talk:47.185.79.83

April 2021
Hello, I'm 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Herschel Walker have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:34, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Herschel Walker. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Herschel Walker, you may be blocked from editing. ~ANM🐁 T·C 22:06, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Herschel Walker. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 06:10, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Herschel Walker, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Mandelbr0t (talk) 00:20, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Walker article
Hi there! I just started a section at the Herschel Walker talk page and am hoping you will participate there. Here's a link. In particular, I am hoping you can explain the reasoning behind your edits and convince other editors to support your improvements. Thanks, Firefangledfeathers (talk) 06:12, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Herschel Walker have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:23, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Herschel Walker was changed by 47.185.79.83 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.888715 on 2021-07-24T00:23:32+00:00

August 2021
Hello, I'm GorillaWarfare. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Herschel Walker—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 22:26, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. In view of the number of warning messages above, all of which you have totally ignored, it is ridiculous that you have not been blocked long ago. In addition to all the other respects in which your editing has been unacceptable, I note that the edit summary for your last edit was an outright lie. I haven't checked to see whether the same applies to any of your other edit summaries. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. JBW (talk) 20:44, 12 October 2021 (UTC)